April 22, 2005

Ratzinger predicted that Buddhism would replace Marxism as the Catholic church's main enemy.

I normally wouldn't post other people's writings in what is supposed to be my own journal/editorial space. But this article by Rabbi Michael Lerner (whom I have long had a lot of respect for) says exactly what I think needs to be said about the new pope. Rabbi Lerner is speaking as a progressive Jewish thinker, but the concerns he raises here, as well as his own sadness for the squandering of all this is of positive value in the Catholic tradition, are identitical to my own as a post-Catholic Buddhist minister.

And note that in Ratzinger's world - Buddhists are the Church's #1 enemy but collaborating with Nazis is not a barrier to sainthood.

Anyway here is the article:

Published on Wednesday, April 20, 2005 by Tikkun.org
The New Pope is a Disaster for the World and for the Jews
Jewish Leader Denounces Selection of Cardinal Ratzinger as New Pope
by Rabbi Michael Lerner

Since the days in which he served in the Nazi army in Germany to his role as the leader of the forces that suppressed the liberatory aspects of Vatican II and purged or silenced the Church of its most creative leadership (including German Catholic theologians Eugene Drewermann and Hans Kung, Brazilian theologian Leonardo Boff, and several prominent American Catholic thinkers), to the present moment in which he is recognized as the leader most identified with the forces of reaction and suppression of dissent within the Church, Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger has distinguished himself as a man who can be counted on to side with the most anti-humane and repressive forces, in opposition to those who seek to give primacy to a world of peace and justice, " said Rabbi Lerner.

Although normally Jews would welcome any choice of leadership by our sister religion, we have particular reason to comment on this choice.


"Jews have a powerful stake and commitment in ending global poverty and oppression. We fully well understand that in a world filled with pain and cruelty, the resulting anger is often channeled in racist, sexist and homophobic directions. Both as a matter of principle, based on our commitment to a prophetic vision, and as a matter of self-interest, Jews have disproportionately supported liberal and progressive social change movements seeking to end war and poverty.

So it was with great distress that we watched as Cardinal Ratzinger led the Vatican in the past twenty-five years on a path that opposed providing birth control information to the poor of the world, thereby ensuring that AIDS would spread and kill millions in Africa.

And we watched with even greater distress as this Cardinal supported efforts to involve the Church in distancing itself from political candidates or leaders who did not agree with the Church's teachings on abortion and gay rights, prioritizing these issues over whether that candidate agreed with the Church on issues of peace and social justice. As a result, Cardinal Ratzinger has led the Church away from its natural alliance with Jews in fighting for peace and social justice and toward a stance which in effect allies the Church with the most reactionary politicians whose policies are militaristic and offer a preferential option for the rich.

We can't help but notice that under Cardinal Ratzinger's tutelage, the Church began moves to elevate the infamous Pope Pius XII to the status of saint. Instead of repenting for the failure of the Church to give unequivocal messages telling all Catholics that they would be prevented from receiving communion for collaborating or cooperating in any way with Nazi rule, or for failing to hide and protect Jews who were marked for extermination, Ratzinger has sought to whitewash this disgraceful moment in Church history. Many Jews are outraged at a Church that denies communion to those who have remarried or those who oppose making abortion illegal but that did not similarly deny communion to those who participate in crimes against humanity.

In fact, Cardinal Ratzinger publicly praised the fascist movement in the Church known as Opes Dei and supported canonization of Josemaria Escriva, the founder of Opus Dei, an open fascist who served in the government of Spain's dictator Franco, and who publicly praised Hitler.

While many of us agree with Ratzinger's critique of moral relativism, he extends that critique in illegitimate and dangerous ways, equating secularism with moral relativism and suggesting that secularism is now repressing religion. Ratzinger also publicly critiques all those inside the Church who are tolerant enough to think that other religions may have equal validity as a path to God. This is a slippery slope toward anti-Semitism and a return to the chauvinistic and triumphalist views that led the Church, when it had the power to do so, to develop its infamous crusades and inquisitions. In 1997 Ratzinger called Buddhism an "autoerotic spirituality" that offers "transcendence without imposing concrete religious obligations." Hindusim, he said, offers "false hope," in that it guarantees "purification" based on a "morally cruel" concept of reincarnation resembling "a continuous circle of hell." At the time, Cardinal Ratzinger predicted that Buddhism would replace Marxism as the Catholic church's main enemy.

Ratzinger is being falsely described as a conservative, when in fact he, despite his publicly genteel manner, is a raging reactionary. Unlike many American conservatives who oppose gay sexual practices but not their legal rights, Ratzinger in 1992 argued against human rights for gays, stressing that their civil liberties could be "legitimately limited.

Those of us in the Jewish world who have enormous respect for Christianity and for the wisdom and beauty of the Catholic tradition are in mourning today that the Church has confirmed for itself a destructive direction that will hurt not only Catholics but all those who seek peace and justice in the world.

We remain hopeful that the new Pope may return to his original more progressive positions (pre-1968) and realize that the world needs a church that can respond compassionately and wisely to what is needed rather than remain wedded to dogma that is so destructive. In a statement that Ratzinger made a few years ago, he seemed deeply aligned with TIKKUN's critique of the selfishness and materialism of the contemporary world. We hope that he stops blaming that on secularists and comes to understand that secularists too, as well as people from other faiths, can be allies in the struggle for a new ethos of love and generosity. We pray that he may find a way to bring a better, kinder, more loving and compassionate agenda to the Catholic Church. It is precisely because we continue to feel allied with the Church.

Meanwhile, we reaffirm our solidarity with the many millions of Catholics who had hoped for a very different kind of Pope who would make the Church more open to women's leadership, to prioritizing social justice, and to returning to the hopeful spirit of Vatican II. We can say publicly what many of you can only say privately-that this new Pope does not represent what is most beautiful and sacred in the teachings of Jesus.


Rabbi Michael Lerner is editor of TIKKUN and author of ten books, including Healing Israel/Palestine (North Atlantic Books, 2003) and Jewish Renewal (Harper Perennial, 1995).

Rabbi Michael Lerner, editor of the world's largest circulation progressive Jewish magazine, TIKKUN, and rabbi of Beyt Tikkun Synagogue in San Francisco, took the unusual step of criticizing the choice made by the Catholic Church for its new Pope, Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger. Lerner was careful to make clear that he was NOT speaking as leader of The Tikkun Community, the interfaith organization whch he co-chairs, which has NOT taken a stand on these issues, but only as editor of TIKKUN magazine.

© 2005 Tikkun Magazine

Posted by Ryuei at April 22, 2005 09:22 AM
Comments

Hi, Michael. I will be the first to jump in here - I remember about six years ago when the Office of the Faith published its paper on the Church's relations with other religions and there was a lot of buzz about it in my more-widely-read-than-typical circle of Gakkai friends. The quote about Buddhism being more dangerous than Marxism brought a lot of attention to Ratzinger. This rather begs the question, however, of whether or not this is true. Part of me hopes so. I mean, imagine a planet where poor women can in fact control their own child-bearing, where they are not condemned to be baby-making machines, poor and waiting for heaven in the next life. Just think!
When Ratzinger was elected, I wasn't surprised, but I was filed with despair...But as you so often say of the Gakkai - hey, it ain't my sangha!

Thanks for this blog - I'm glad that there are some peopl (lie Lerner) who are willing to get past the fuzzy honeymoon blather in the press and look at the real direction, here. Talk to you later Byrd in LA

Posted by: Byrd in LA at April 22, 2005 10:32 AM

Ryuei:

My mother was Catholic and my father was Lutheran so I'm well versed in the attitude of the Church. I don't find Ratzinger's remarks on Buddhism unusual. Pope John Paul showed an openness to other traditions, even meeting the Dalai Lama several times. But he would publically denounce Buddhism. His dialogue with other religions was just a cheap show because in his heart, John Paul thought we were inferior.

The fact that Ratzinger regards Buddhism as an "enemy" on the same level of Marxism shows the wisdom of the Church. By that I mean that Buddhism is a teaching of hope and liberation while the Catholic Church is a boat anchor around the soul of humanity. I find it interesting that most of the Catholics I know don't regard Buddhism as an "enemy" on par with Marxism - in fact, they think it's a good thing. It's the leadership of the Catholic Church, with their mideval world view, arrogance, and coldness that smear great religions like Hinduism and Buddhism.

Honestly, there has been so much depravity, cruelty, and backward thinking by the Catholic Church, I find it astonishing that anyone could possibly believe in it. But I've matured enough not to think any less of those who believe in the Church's doctrine.

As for myself, I would rather have my nails pulled out, be burned at the stake, be torn limb from limb by wild beasts, or be reborn as a dung beetle, than be a Catholic. They betrayed my grandparents and turned my mother in a guilt ridden alcoholic. If I were to choose the path that pulls one furthest from the path to enlightenment, I would say that would be the path of a Catholic priest.

Thanks for posting this one, Ryuei.

Charles

Posted by: Charles at April 22, 2005 11:42 AM

I'm really glad you reprinted this article. I think sharing the writings of others is as valuable as writing our own blogs. It's an expression of what's going on in your head, and helps us all be aware of articles we might never see otherwise. I'm one of those people who constantly xeroxes magazine articles and mails them to friends. This is a way to do it en masse to our dharma friends. (I do it all the time, although I do sometimes wonder if it's kosher!)

Posted by: Queen Lolo at April 22, 2005 09:42 PM

Ryuei, Queen Lolo and all other writers at FWP:

The Queen wrote:

"I think sharing the writings of others is as valuable as writing our own blogs."

I agree. However, we should all keep firmly in mind copyright laws. "Fair Use" is the ambiguous term that allows writers, reviewers, and the media to quote from another author's writing. Although there is no hard and fast legal limit, in general the use of 300 words without permission from the author is what much of the publishing industry goes by.

Reprinting someone's writing electronically is the same legally as putting it in print. No one has been busted yet, but I was a tad concerned when another FWP writer would publish entire blog articles, well over the limit. We should also be very careful when we quote or present an article (exactly like Ryuei did) to attribute the source.

Some writers are more touchy about this than others. As an author, I don't mind being quoted, but if I am, I want credit.

Charles

Posted by: Charles at April 23, 2005 09:13 AM

Hi Michael,

I heard you are coming to Denmark in August. Look forward to seeing you.

Best regards
Peter

Posted by: Peter Röder at April 23, 2005 10:18 AM

I am enjoying reading all that everyone has to comment on. I do have a question for everyone. Are most ex NSA/SGI members like I am? What is your practice now? In other words, do you still do Gongyo, chant daimoke and study? Speaking of Gongyo, do you do it the old way or the new way - Gongyo Lite I call it:)

Also, do you practice alone or with others? I am seeking and searching right now for my own answers.

Posted by: gracie at April 24, 2005 08:59 AM

Hi Gracie,
You will find a lot of answers to your questions in the blogs on this site. Go and read some of the older entries in particular. You asked, "Are most ex-NSA/SGI members like I am?" I can promise that no one is like you are... everyone is different, but we all have things in common. The key is to find what works for YOU... and I'd love to to know what that is. (Read my blog "Buddhist is not on the SATs and comment away.) And welcome to FWP...

Posted by: Queen Lolo at April 24, 2005 11:27 AM

Hi Peter and Gracie,
While I appreciate your comments, they are not pertinent to this blog entry. It would be better to direct any off-topic comments to me directly at ryuei2000@yahoo.com or Sryuei@aol.com.

Either that or go to the Nichiren Shu yahoo group:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nichirenshubuddhism/

Or the Sangha for Independents:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SanghaForIndependents/

Or the Taiten list:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/taiten/

Or some other list appropriate to your questions.

Also, as a reminder, I have previously said that I will delete off-topic comments, spam, or links that are not pertinent to the topic at hand. It is not that I don't want people to write to me about other things - those should be directed to my emails and the yahoo groups. This blog is my editorial space and online journal, and so I wish to restrict the comment section to comments directly relating to the topic of the blog entry.

Namu Myoho Renge Kyo,
Ryuei

Posted by: Ryuei at April 24, 2005 11:31 AM

Thank you, Ryuei, I agree... I wanted to reply to Gracie though and not leave her hanging. Why don't you leave the comments up for a couple of days and then delete..

Posted by: Queen Lolo at April 24, 2005 12:58 PM

I think everyone knows how I feel so I won't belabor the point. Nothing this man known now as Benedict XVI said is outside the orthodoxy of the church. He's not some loose cannon, but someone articulating the church's official position and teaching. So don't blame the man, find fault with the institution and stop lending credence to it.

Posted by: Philip Brett at April 25, 2005 11:11 AM