1990 marks a crucial time in the history of American Nichiren Buddhism. It was in that year that Nikken Shonin, then the Highpriest of Nichiren Shoshu, excommunicated Daisaku Ikeda and the other leaders of the Soka Gakkai International. As with most important events this one would prove to be mutli-layered and dimensional.
One of the things this did was to provide an umbrella for many very disgruntled members and former members of the Soka Gakkai to hide under. The “Temple Group”, as SGI would later refer to the Nichiren Shoshu (NSS) lay-movement would take on a distinct identity in later years, though in those first few years after the split, the temple was mostly populated by those who simply could never get along in SGI, and those who left because of something some leader said or did that they could not reconcile.
In my recollection, living and practicing in the Sillycon Valley of the San Francisco Bay Area, we had only one or two families disconnect from SGI in order to remain with the Temple, which was Myoshin-ji in Pinole, California. One such family’s mother, we learned later, had aspirations for both her sons to enter the NSS priesthood. This seemed curious to me then, and more so now, as few American’s had even the slightest clue what was involved with entering a Japanese Buddhist priesthood, or if even such a thing was possible. The Father soon was diagnosed with a brain tumor and had to leave the family to seek rest and recuperation in peace with a relative. Looking back, as they were a Hispanic family, I also recall that they had come from Catholic backgrounds and this may have accounted for the priesthood fixation, as it has with many Americans who have, since 1990, sought refuge with NSS under the care and authority of the priests.
What is not openly discussed is the actual history of events, moods and subtle nuances of time as it passed during the 90’s. Our “Soka Spirit” movement, which would become a significant movement within the SGI Youth Division, took many years to form. The temple incident was strictly a hush-hush and taboo discussion topic and was not openly discussed for many years after it happened. American SGI had no precedent to learn from in dealing with such an event, and virtually no appreciation for it’s importance in later years.
Only now in this last year has discussion surrounding the events of the actual beginning of this conflict begun to be openly discussed. The schism between the priesthood and the SGI came to a initial peak in 1979. At that time Pres. Ikeda stepped down, in true Japanese fashion, from his position as President of the Soka Gakkai, and was moved laterally to the Soka Gakkai International. In fact I learned a few years later in a personal discussion with Mr. Yoshimachi, an SGI leader of some weight and importance, that at that time Pres. Ikeda clearly did not feel he had the support from the membership to stand up to the already authoritarian priesthood.
All of these events are poorly recorded, and even my recollection of them is jaded by my personal geographic location and my own individual perspective. No one seems interested in recorded actual events, not without strongly slanting them to one advantage or another. As I have stated in previous articles, the Japanese are habitual liars and lying is an historical part of their cultural heritage.
There was another phenomenon particular to the post-1990 excommunication - the appearance of other Nichiren sects. Interestingly, even today few SGI members understand the proliferation of separate and individual Nichiren traditions. Few SGI members began practicing with an interest in Buddhism at all, rather the desire to experience the benefits of practicing Nichiren’s Buddhism.
The ranks of Nichiren Shu swelled slightly as many of the drop-out Gakkai members claiming to want to have nothing to do with politics and in-fighting between the SGI and NSS sought refuge there. Other sects which previously had minimal presence, such as Honmon Butsuryu Shu and Kempon Hokke appeared in the form of cyber sanghas, groups which only existed as internet forums with members communicating only by way of e-mail and messaging via USENET forums such as alt.religion.Buddhism.Nichiren.
Today yahoo groups and other forums have proliferated in a myriad of different forms all claiming some correct version of Nichiren faith. These have always interested me, for many reasons. The most significant curiosity has to do with the very nature of sangha itself, as the word is used in Buddhism.
Sangha: Sanskrit; a term for the Buddhist monastic community.
I was reminded recently by a post from a Nichiren Independent on one of the many such discussion forums to which I am subscribed, of the implications of practicing Buddhism in cyberspace. The post had to do with a request for experiences to be shared. For anyone not familiar with Soka Gakkai Nichiren Buddhism, the cornerstone of the SGI is the discussion meeting. In the discussion meeting it is the personal experience or testament of the benefit of one’s practice of chanting Nam Myoho Renge Kyo that stands as the pillar of every successful discussion meeting.
Needless to say a cyberspace Buddhist sangha cannot share their experiences in the same fashion as in a face-to-face discussion meeting, rather experiences must be written and posted on a forum. This negates much of the most important qualities of sharing an experience - the non-verbal communication, enthusiasm and other personal human qualities that go hand-in-hand with sharing a personal story.
Most internet users, I believe, perhaps haven’t spent sufficient time “doing the math” of what cyber communication really is. One of the most important things to consider is that without a human being relaying a personal story, the reader is left only with words printed on a computer screen. In order for a persona to be present, the reader must create said persona from their own mind. In essence without knowing the person who posted the experience, the essence of the individual “saying” the words is actually a creation of the reader’s mind, not a true representation of the writer.
This reality sheds what I feel are catastrophic realities on all Buddhist cyber sanghas. In the Soka Gakkai, a difficult aspect of practice in our organization is dealing with all sorts of people, including people we would normally not associate with. We have a cross-section of our US population with representatives of all ethnic racial peoples, peoples of all sexual preference and those from every imaginable life-experience. This makes the SGI a truly international sangha and it is from this wide-based personal association that many inconspicuous benefits arise.
Compare this to the earlier Buddhist sects to come from overseas, such as the American Buddhist Churches of the Nembutsu sect which were present in the US at the end of the 19th Century, and later the esoteric and intellectual American Zen movement. Nichiren Shu made it’s advent in Hawaii much earlier on, shortly after the turn of the Century. All of these groups however and specifically the Buddhist Church were centered around the Japanese community and were virtually 100% Japanese. In this respect their sangha was actually a cultural shelter more than an active Buddhist community.
The cyber sangha, I believe, is destined to the same fate, merely existing as a shelter for the “socially challenged” rather than those sincerely seeking the benefit of sincere Buddhism practice. I do not call a curse on the Nichiren Independents - quite the opposite I wish the best of results from anyone who seeks to embrace the Gohonzon and Daimoku of Nichiren, as well as his writings and teachings.
In SGI there is a bifurcation of Buddhism, in my interpretation. There is both Nichirenism, and the tradition of the Gakkai itself in the form of daily practice, it’s educational tradition and other aspects that are distinctly unique to both the Soka Gakkai and the legacy of the three Presidents. The sooner SGI members come to fully understand this divisional synergy, the better off they will be in the future.
Soka Gakkai has, after 1990, come to recklessly throw about the term “orthadox Nichiren Buddhism”. Many of us parrot such slogans as “just as Nichiren teaches”, and “return to Nichiren's Teachings”.
Orthodox is a hard word and one that has a specific and narrow meaning. I cringe every time this word is used at a Gakkai meeting. I understand it feels good to say it, but our Buddhism is far from orthodox. I hope that as the years unfold we will come to both understand the difference between our Buddhist practice and orthodox Nichiren Buddhism, as well and the inevitability that all things evolve. Orthodox can all too quickly come to mean “stuck” in many ways.
Having spent a considerable amount of time studying the writings of Nichiren, as well as the traditions of other sects, it has become clear to me, since just after our split with Nichiren Shoshu, that its teachings are neither orthodox nor even historically accurate. Additionally it must be made clear in the Soka Gakkai that we still largely attempt to uphold this aberrant form of Nichiren’s Buddhism.
There are Nichiren traditions that fit the label “orthodox”, and Kempon Hokke comes immediately to mind. We in the Soka Gakkai should understand that we are a lay movement, not a traditional Nichiren Sect. SGI members should come to realize that one aspect of the events of 1990 is that we can be free and not enslaved by the authority of a twisted and fantastical tradition, one which more closely resembles the Catholic Church rather than a true Buddhist tradition.
More importantly as Soka Gakkai faithful we are not each obligated to study Nichiren’s teachings in an academic and scholarly fashion. Everyone should strive to find their niche. For those of us who do wish to study, the time has come to begin to sort out that which is real and discard that which has been invented to serve ulterior agendas.
SGI exists to provide a path for every person to become happy through the practice of Nichiren’s Buddhism. Our tradition is one of personal practice and a community which is broad and varied. Whether we like it or not, not everyone who encounters SGI will remain. For those who are fortunate to be able to practice in SGI, we need to make study and personal practice our own personal responsibility and take ownership of our personal understanding of the teachings of Nichiren. Until this happens our Buddhism will in affect be owned by someone else.
Happy New Year
Rev. Greg
Hi, Greg -- I'm glad to see you're starting this discussion, and I hope that many people are able to benefit and gain perspective from this post and the ones which are sure to follow.
I would like to take issue with your characterizationof the cyber-sangha as being primarily for the "socially challenged" The fact is that we are in the process of developing cyber-communities of Buddhists - something that has never really been done before. Although some participants in the cyber-sangha may have social "challenges", I think that the internet is also a good place for the adventurous and the open-minded. I have met many, many interesting minds (yourself included) online - people I would not otherwise have met. I have also gained insights I would never have gained if I had limited my exchanges to those in my immediate SGI environment. The online comunity has helped me find the right books to read and offered me a place to openly discuss ideas -- something which rarely happens at the discussion meeting level. The beauty of the cyber-sangha is that it is not subject to any intellectual chaperones who can drag us off for "guidance" at the first whisper of adult reasoning and independent thought.
You also note that the Japanese are "habitual liars" - surely you will grant, then, that some Americans distance themselves from the SGI because of ethical issues with this sort of conduct, and not because they themselves (the Americans) are "socially challenged"? I mean, some people just don't like being lied to, and don't see hanging out with people who lie to them as necessary to their own enlightenment. That doesn't mean that they're "socially challenged". Quite the contrary. We could argue just as forcefully that these individuals are "ethically gifted", could we not?
In regard to Nichiren Shoshu's "aberrant form of Buddhism" which the SGI still upholds (for the most part): why do you think this is? DO you think that the American organization will ever be able to establish a tradition of Buddhist scholarship independent of "aberrant" doctrines? Or do you think this task will fall entirely to the cyber-sangha?
Wow, this is a long comment - almost a blog entry of its own. Please pardon my wordiness, Greg, and thanks again for the topic.
Best, Byrd in LA
Posted by: Byrd in LA at December 26, 2007 10:58 PMI don't think Greg meant to infer that all who left SGI are socially challenged. If that is true - we're all challenged. Buddhism on the web has come along way. The early days - late 80's through the 90's - were spent fighting and flaming each other over whose Buddhism reigns supreme. Now many of us have learned how to control ourselves on-line and not write something we wouldn't say in person.
For me the web is a great place to talk about SGI and Nichiren Buddhism without judgment. There are some things I just don't want to bring up in front of Japanese octogenarians.
Interesting blog, Greg. I think that the SGI (-USA, at least) is destined to become a small and insular entity comparable to the Seventh Day Adventists in Christianity, due mostly to its adherence and submission to those Japanese liars you describe, but who really knows? Time will tell.
A minor correction: I believe that the first excommunication occurred in 1991, not 1990. Maybe I'm wrong, but that's what my old memory tells me. No biggie, though.
Happy New Year!
Andy
Posted by: Andy Hanlen at December 28, 2007 06:44 PMGreg,
Well written article.
I believe the internet offers both opportunities and misopportunities to interact. I have experienced both on the internet.
I have found people are prone to be more rude and less respectful on the internet; if they so desire;, as the person they are disaparaging can not look them in their eyes or even speak to them on the telephone.
I belive this alone leads to poor internet relations, unless of course you are like-minded as the other person, which offers no challenge to grow individually, which the SGI-USA District meeting allows to occur.
Like Mrs. Martin says, 'potatoes scrubbing each other; human revolutions of many people at once.'
There is nothing like a good interpersonal relationship based on faith, friendship, and dialogue.
Regarding lying, the Japanese do not have a corner on that market, it is human nature I think. I have met just as many American's that lie as I have any other ethnic group.
I tend not to associate any one trait to any one ethnic group as that would be perceived as biased.
Being a Black American, I find people do this all the time; associating a trait to a specific ethnic group, i.e. rap music, loose pants, etc..
happy New Year!
Patrick
Rev. Greg:
In my mind, there is no substitute for life-to-life training. The SGI is a veritable training ground in faith, practice, and study. There is no limit of opportunity for interface and guidance.
With that said, the SGI upholds, teaches, and defends dubious and historically inaccurate dcotrine. One of the major reasons I was incapable of embracing Christianity was its mythologies contradictions with science and the supernatural elements that required faith instead of proof. If the SGI would extract itself from the doctrinal heresy and historical hockum of Nichiren Shoshu, I wouldn't have much reason to be one of those independents you mentioned.
My daughter, who is now a 28 year old fukushi, is unconcerned with the dilapitaded doctrines of the SGI/NST, and she loves sensei. But she practices independent and shides attending meetings as nary a day goes by when she doesn't have three or four emails trying to get her to meetings. Further, if they had her telephone number, they might call her ten times a day! Although I am no longer hounded, I was once that hound and know of what my kid speaks.
Anyway, for me, the internet has been my life line and forum for disseminating Buddhism. I would love to go back to meetings to listen, learn, and share, but since my former sangha and I are so far apart on doctrine and there are deep scars for me, the internet has been a blessing from the Gods.
One more thing: fraughtwithperil has been a great resource for people all over the world. The discussion meeting has no equal, but the internet is an invaluable forum and sangha seekers of all kind and especially the disenfranchised.
Charles
Posted by: Charles at December 28, 2007 10:49 PMA couple notes:
I think the Internet is good for more academic things that could never happen at SGI meetings for a lot of reasons.
I also think that in ten years SGI doctrine will look at a lot like Nichiren Shu. It is getting there now. Nichiren as Buddha of Kuon Ganjo is being replaced by "Buddha of the Latter Day," whatever that means.
Ryuei made a good point -- as lot of American people still think Shakyamuni is Hotei -- the fat laughing Buddha. So venerating him may seem odd.
We all chant because it works, the rest of sort of filling in a rationale we can deal with. I think OMNPMH, OTRTTRTRSH, OARPTND work too. I do not know if they would work for me If I did not have experience with Daimoku first.
A lot of people have huge western phobias about chanting to statues or paintings. I did too. I did it to challenge my phobia. It is rather a kewl experience.
It is hilarious to read people making up stories that Nichiren opposed statues as Honzon. I suspect he would find it funny too. I mean, from the unglossed Kanjin Honzon Sho, it is pretty clear he was telling them to carve statues of the Buddha with 4 attendants.
done rambling
gassho
robin
Posted by: robin at January 4, 2008 07:54 AMBryd,
In the above comment you wrote, "I mean, some people just don't like being lied to, and don't see hanging out with people who lie to them as necessary to their own enlightenment. That doesn't mean that they're "socially challenged". Quite the contrary. We could argue just as forcefully that these individuals are "ethically gifted", could we not?"
Indeed, if we revisit to the basics of Buddhism and review our Four Nobel Truths and the Eightfold Path, we'll see "right speech" spelled out in black and white right there near the top of the list. Personally, I don't care what someone chants, how or if they meditate, where they practice, what tradition they follow, or if they hang out in a live sangha or nurture their dharma connections online. But I DO care about the basics of Buddhism... about honesty and integrity... about compassion and kindness and love... and especially about TRUTH. The lying issue is a deal breaker for me.
Posted by: Queen Lolo at January 14, 2008 08:28 AM