This last Labor day weekend I took the family to Camp Campbell, a YMCA camp in the California redwoods, for family camp. Each family stays in it’s own cabin and enjoys a variety of camp activities, including archery, arts and crafts and camp fires at night.
Among the traditional activities I enjoyed my own personal time practicing shurikenjutsu amongst the redwoods trees that offer friendly targets for my shuriken.....
Among the traditional activities I enjoyed my own personal time practicing shurikenjutsu amongst the redwoods trees that offer friendly targets for my shuriken. The shuriken widely used in my art are the Bo shuriken, or needle shuriken. They are fundamentally different from the star shuriken of the ninja movies. Star shuriken are easily thrown by anyone and not an effective weapon, used rather as a distraction by the historical ninja. Despite this fact California has chosen, by virtue of nothing more than fear response from ninja movies, to make the star shuriken a felony to possess. Contrast this to a misdemeanor charge for carrying a concealed firearm illegally and you have an idea of the legal climate of California. Please believe however that there was method to the madness of creating these laws.
As I was throwing bo shuriken into a redwood tree stump which rewarded me with a delightful “tock” sound when the shurkiken hit, a young teenage boy passed by. After passing his curiosity got the better of him and he wandered back cautiously to ask what it was that I was doing. I nonchalantly replied that I was throwing shurkiken and asked if he would like to try, extending to him three of the 9 shuriken in my hand.
He quickly replied “no” lowering his head and abruptly went on his way. It was obvious by his non-verbal communication that while curious and no matter how cool what I was doing was to him, that it would be considered bad behavior to do such a thing as throw shuriken. His conditioning, whether from his parents or school, was very effective indeed. Anything involving weapons must be bad.
What boy wouldn’t want to try something as cool as throw a shuriken? My 9 year old daughter can throw shuriken.
Warriorship in our society
Warriorship in our society has become schizophrenic. We, the enlightened faction of our society, have raced to castrate our young males against violence in our society, in essence sacrificing their ability to naturally learn to become self-sufficient for some lofty ideal. More often then not however the youngsters who are taught not to play with toy guns or engage in play which mimics violence are the very children who will later need those basic play-learned skills both to protect themselves and to survive as soldiers in a modern army very much concerned with foreign US interests. Military intervention has become as much a business in the US as microchips or agriculture. In the future virtually every young soldier can expect to see combat.
H. John Poole, in his book “A Tiger’s Way, A Private’s Best Chance for Survival” writes extensively about the modern Western soldiers basic lack of field skills. He graphically illustrates how the armies of all our historical enemies have practiced ninjutsu against us including finely honed field and survival skills. In contrast the modern Western soldier relies heavily on technology and advanced weaponry. Poole's point is that while we will continue to win the conflicts in which we are determined to win (a key point in itself) we will continue to lose the lives of many more young men then we would if our young men had been allowed to learn basic warriorship and survival as they once did in the early part of the 1900’s. Our modern military devotes neither the time nor money to teaching these skills.
It’s interesting to note two things; nearly every special forces soldier I have had contact with was once a Boy Scout, and most were Eagle Scouts. The second and less related fact is that once upon a time Camp Campbell itself had a rifle range. Can you imagine the controversy if the YMCA re-opened a range today with .22 caliber rifles for young people to learn how to shoot?
In the book “Warrior Dreams, Violence and Manhood in Post-Vietnam America” there are many important points made, including the ineffectiveness of gun control. However the most vital point that comes to mind is James William Gibson’s illustration that as factions in American society attempt to repress military culture in every way (including banning the sale of military clothing) this culture itself becomes more and more attractive throughout society. Much like human sexuality, militarism and the culture of violence, when repressed and made naughty, re-emerges in perverted and frightening ways such as the Columbine School murders to name only one of many. The gun has taken on magical and talismanic properties where it once was viewed as an important tool.
Warriorship is widely mistaken for violence. As a martial arts instructor I often am faced with parents who are turned off by the name “ninjutsu” and choose instead arts such as Tae Kwon Do for their children, an art which in application can be more of a liability then an asset - in my opinion. In a discussion recently with another woman Shidoshi a story was relayed to me of how she taught handgun skills at an Aikido seminar. Afterwards she received numerous complaints via e-mail and postal mail regarding the inappropriateness of guns in martial arts. She was very discouraged by this widely held belief that guns and shooting “are not martial arts”. On the other hand there are those who firmly believe that shooting straight is in reality the only true American martial art.
Parents are quick to choose martial arts schools which have been carefully marketed to emphasize first and foremost benefits such as character development, fitness, discipline before self-defense. For this reason it is universally understood throughout the Bujinkan that we Shidoshi will not get rich from our schools. We will never be marketable enough for that, and that’s ok.
N’Orlins and Katrina
I was glued to the TV for the first few days following the demise of Katrina and the appearance of the damage reeked from her visit. I recall initial reports stating “not the worst case scenario” but then quickly it became apparent that that was not accurate.
According to my recall it took only two days for the appearance of “armed bands of men” to begin roving the streets. This gang mentality would not have been prevented by the absence of firearms. These same bands could just as well taken shape with machetes, baseball bats or any combination of farm or construction tools.
Strange stories began to emerge about bullying and even rape inside the New Orleans Convention center. Thousands of survivors were virtually trapped inside, many or most without the ability to defend against bigger, stronger and certainly more aggressive males who had reverted quickly to primal behaviors of domination and exploitation. We now know that many police officers literally threw down their badges and walked off the job, and even committed suicide. Still other articles I have read reported that national guardsmen refused to allow survivors access to existing food supplies in shelters and themselves had formed temporary tribal units for the sole purpose of protection.
We here in the United States of America have been safe and comfortable for so long that we have largely forgotten the importance of the ability to self-protect or be self-reliant. We have not known open warfare on our soil since the 1800’s during our own Civil War. Other parts of the world have not known actual peace for much longer. It is the citizenry and not the Government that is attempting to outlaw private firearm ownership. This, I believe, is due to the illusion that if we give up this vital freedom we will receive peace and security in return.
There is no example of this sort of thing happening anywhere in the world at anytime. Freedoms lost are never replaced by anything of value.
Farther down the road it could be the outlawing of martial arts, knives, and swords, because the perverted effect of fear response knows no boundaries. Fear is a dangerous thing indeed with a life all it’s own.
Warriorship is vastly confused with fighting and the killing of an enemy. In reality warriorship is more accurately connected with the broad concept of self-reliance, the ability to protect oneself and others both in times of war and in times of crisis.
I fear less for my self. I am 45 and I hope will not live long enough to witness the appearance of the tyrannical Government against which our Constitution and Bill of Rights granted us protection both through the right to own firearms and the responsibility as Americans for its opposition.
There are many who cannot envision this sort of Government ever arising in the United States and yet our entire brief history is based on that very revolution. Throughout the world, wars, revolutions, coups and rebellions are taking place even as I write this blog. Why do we consider ourselves to be exempt?
It is my children, and their children for whom I fear. I fear for a future when Americans become unarmed and unempowered servants to yet another enslaving Government. If we look closely at what transpired in New Orleans we can see that human nature has not evolved at all in our brief appearance on this planet. We can revert to enemy tribes in the blink of an eye, or in this case, in the blink of the eye of the hurricane. Our technological and scientific advances have done little to make us the enlightened and erudite creatures we often fancy ourselves.
Why do most people feel safe from danger? Simply and solely because nothing truly dangerous has happened to them yet. This is the folly of youth and innocence. Nothing bad will happen, because nothing bad has happened yet.
This is self-defense by ignorance.
Evolve or perish.
Rev. Greg, Shidoshi
Thank you for this post, Greg. It synthesizes many things that I have been reading and thinking about lately.
Posted by: lyssa at September 22, 2005 01:57 AMWonderful comments from all. Thank you Peace, and thank you Adrian for taking the time to add to this. Nice to see another Ninja stealth on to my blog...
Rev. Greg
Posted by: Rev. Greg at September 21, 2005 04:39 PMIf any readers doubt Rev Greg's assessment of the government and the future of Americans, and indeed one might add those of other nations as well, then a reading of this commentary by formr Reagan administration official Paul Craig Roberts should bring home the darkness that looms.
http://www.antiwar.com/roberts/?articleid=7282
Posted by: peace at September 19, 2005 01:47 AMIn Australia the government outlawed slingshots, they also banned swords which are other than ornamental, no edges allowed.
I know that both Japan and England were considering stricter knife control laws. In England they currently record your identification information when buying certain knives, in fact there was a recent call in England to ban carving knives.
When England banned firearms from private possession an odd thing occurred: violent crime involving firearms skyrocketed.
California bans double edged knives.
When America was a much safer, much more civil society most schools had rifle teams and children, yes children, with firearms were not considered something to call the SWAT Team about.
I do not think that banning this or banning that is the answer to violence.
I do not think that ensuring that the weak, the elderly and so forth are disarmed is a means to greater safety and security for those people.
Criminals do not obey laws, the law-abiding do.
As Rev Greg pointed out there was a time that the young men of America were raised with skills that translated to military experience. Sgt York of US Army WW1 may be a familiar example for some.
Rev Greg is also tellingly accurate in that once a freedom is taken by the government it is not given back.
As a Buddhist I revere life and seek only peace.
Yet I believe we, each of us, has the right to self defense. The Dalai Lama feels the same way.
What is interesting to me is that merely the display of a firearm will often end the predator's attack before it reaches the physical phase no shot needing to be fired.
What bullies and punks who assault and rape and murder people want are helpless victims they don't like their chances if their "victim" is armed.
In all of history it appears that humans will make prey of other humans and it is hoped that the good will prevail over the evil.
The horrors at the New Orleans Superdome are a reminder that there are among us those without reverence for life.
Posted by: peace at September 19, 2005 01:22 AM I don't think I could have said any of this better myself. But knowing that it is all true spells out our responsibilities for us all the more clearly.
It reminds me of what it is to own an old sword. Someone once pointed out that it was a lot of responsibility, being the temporary caretaker of this ancient thing which had existed long before him, and would exist long after. Clean it, care for it, keep it sharp. Each time we oil and clean it, we are also silently rejoicing that we do not need it for the purpose it was once made, and indeed has many times been used before our birth. At the same time, we know that day may come again, and so we oil it, and keep it sharp, that it might be clean and keen in the hands of someone as yet unborn who will need it whole, perfect, and carefully preserved.
If ever that day comes on which that blade is needed, after this time of peace, it will be those to whom we have passed it who will have it's strength to draw on. Cleaning that blade, how many times has peace come to it? How many such as ourselves have cared for it and passed it forward through history perfect as we found it? How many times has conflict come again?
The world is fortunate to have Rev. Greg keeping that sword clean and oiled.
Thanks both Ryuei and Chikushonin for your wonderful comments. Great contribution Chikushonin, I appreciate your life experience and perspective.
Ryuei, yeah - Arnold seems like a very grounded sort of guy. Bet he is a terror in competition though!
Rev. Greg
Posted by: Rev. Greg at September 11, 2005 03:43 AMWow,
Great blog, and great comments from Chikushonin. You have both given me a lot to think about, though I had been thinking along the same lines in a rudimentary way before. BTW, I would like to mention that my sensei's son, Arnold, is a Kendo champion and an assistant instructor at the Kendo school at the San Jose Temple, and he has always struck me as a very gentle but also very self-reliant and capable person. My impression of him is that he is a true sportsman and also a true warrior in the sense that has been described here - not someone who is violent but someone who has the skills and confidence and capability to avoid violence or (if all else fails) who can use force judiciously so as to avert harm. Many times Arnold has given talks on the Dharma that have been inspired by his martial arts experience as well as his experience in the workplace (he is an office manager) and his broad experience and capablities in the martial arts and business world have given his Buddhist instructions a grounding and practicality that other Dharma teachers sometimes fail to have.
Namu Myoho Renge Kyo,
Ryuei
Dear Rev. Greg,
Because I grew up in a culture of poverty, I feel qualified to suggest to you that there was no reverting to primal behaviors of domination and exploitation at the convention center in New Orleans. Rather, it was business as usual in a culture of poverty. The main differences here are the sheer numbers of vulnerable people in a centralized location, the circumstances that brought about an elevated state of vulnerability, and the intense scrutiny of the media. Such behavior is not isolated.
I will agree with you that when the chips are down, unfortunately, the circumstances can bring out the worst in people. Living in poverty, the chips are always down.
I am in complete agreement with your statement, “Warriorship is vastly confused with fighting and the killing of an enemy. In reality warriorship is more accurately connected with the broad concept of self-reliance, the ability to protect oneself and others both in times of war and in times of crisis.”
There are many ways to fight, protecting self and others. The first skills of my own survival training taught me to talk fast, hit hard and run like the wind. A few years later, when life was on the line, and not just a beating, these skills changed to learning to show no fear. For bullies who depend on fear and intimidation, nothing is more frightening than someone who is not afraid.
I also agree that fear takes on a life of it’s own. Fearlessness also takes on a life of it’s own.
Personally, I praise your ninjaness, your Warriorship, as defined above. We need warriors. This is a reality that at times includes fighting and killing the enemy.
At the same time, as a Buddhist, I am in the business of effecting and affecting change in the realities of my environment, influencing my environment. Hopefully, manifesting in my actions the wisdom appropriate to the circumstances of the present moment—not excluding wise Warriorship.
The first 20 years of my life I lived in poverty. In the following years I discovered how to make money and jumped to the conclusion that poor people are poor because they are stupid. Later still, I came to understand that people are poor for many reasons.
Ultimately, poverty arises from greed, anger, and ignorance.
Prosperity is found when people manifest the wisdom and courage to be neither the abused nor the abuser.
I think this is in context with your definition of 'Warriorship'?