November 13, 2005

Distribution of the Mementos?

The Succession Issue Controversy

A Comparison and Contrast of the "Go-ibutsu-haibun-cho" {"Distribution of the Mementos"} with the "Go-yui-gon" {"Nichiren's Last Will & Testament"}.

The "Distribution of the Mementos" is often cited to defend Nissho & Nichiro against the charges that they over-ruled Nichiren's Last Will, by removing items from Nichiren's grave site at Minobu. The Shuso Gosenge Kiroku, by Nikko, and kept at Nishiyama Honmon-ji, definitely contradicts & discredits the Minobu & Ikegami Transfer Documents. But it, the Kiroku, also contradicts & discredits the "Distribution of the Mementos."

General Conditions after the Death of St. Nichiren Part One... offers a Kempon Hokke-Jumonryu perspective. I am not starting a "Lamont Lied" campaign. And I e-mailed the contact from that web site. But the information from that page has caused confusion. He quotes the Shuso Gosenge Kiroku accurately in regard to:

* Naming of 6 overall successors, ranked by seniority.
* No Rank at Minobu -- 6 equal Elders on a rotation system.
* The funeral procession.

All of this contradicts Taisekiji claims, and discredits the Minobu & Ikegami Transfer Documents. Then he comes to the Will, and he omits the actual Testament from the Shuso Gosenge Kiroku. Instead of the actual Will from the Kiroku, the article cites the "Distribution of the Mementos" This is NOT part of the Shuso Gosenge Kiroku.

The "Distribution of the Mementos" is the "Go-ibutsu-haibun-cho"
(御遺物配分帳) kept at Ikegami Hommonji.

御 = go = Honorable
遺物 = ibutsu = momento
配分 = haibun = distribution
帳 = cho = notes

He quotes it as stating:

"The Lotus Sutra, (with notes in Nichiren's own hand), one set to Ben-ajari (Nissho) (This annotated Lotus Sutra is called the "Chu Hokekyo")."

"Object of Worship, one figure, a statue of Shakyamuni, to Daikoku-ajari (Nichiro) One horse and one cloak to Sado-ko (Niko)"

This contradicts the highly esteemed Shuso Gosenge Kiroku, "Record of the Passing of the Founder", by Nikko Shonin. The Kiroku is a true "T" original preserved at Nishiyama, and includes the signatures & seals of Nissho, Nichiro, Nichiji and Niko. The last paragraph of the Kiroku is the "Last Will of Nichiren" (Go-yui-gon). This is where it states that the Statue and Annotated Hokkekyo are to be placed at the Grave Site. Here are 3 translations of the actual Testament from the Shuso Gosenge Kiroku:
````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
"The standing statue of Shakyamuni Buddha must be set up by the side of the grave. ‘The Annotation of the Lotus Sutra,’ my personal collection of the sutra with the most essential quotations, must be kept in the mausoleum, and the six disciples must check this in their turn. Other sacred teachings are not necessarily kept this way.” In accord with his last will, I record the above. The 16th day of the 10th month of 5th year of Ko’an {October 16 1282}
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Shakya standing statue grave beside must [be] placed. My collection [of] most essential writings namely [the] explanatory notes [to the] Hokkekyou [put in] same basket [and] place [them in] mausoleum. Six persons fragrant flower take turns."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"The Honorable testament dictates: Of the Buddha; the standing statue of Shakya, must be placed beside [My] grave. Of the Sutra; My most essential writings, namely, the explanatory notes to the Hokkekyo, [Chu Hokekyo] are to be placed together, in the mausoleum. The six [equally ranked] disciples, at the time of their watch, must read these. Other sacred teachings are not restricted in this manner. In accord with [His] last will, it is wholly recorded as above. The fifth year of Koan, the tenth month, the sixteenth day." -- Recorder, Nikko.
````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
Also, according to a Nichiren Shu organization, Nichiren Buddhism Modern Religious Institute:

[Translation by Eddy]: "In Heisei 4 [1992], November, the Gosenge Kiroku (in the archives of Nishiyama Hommonji) that was written by Nikko, was designated an important national property, and its [contents] made open to the public. Its contents are indeed valuable information with regards to the funeral arrangements of that time, especially the matter concerning rotation duty. It is written in Koan 5 [1282] Oct 16. Towards the end of the document, there is [Nichiren's] Last Will which mentions: "the standing statue of Shakya, is to be set up beside the grave." (end of translation)."
````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
This supports Nikko's claim, and the Taisekiji & SGI position, that Nissho & Nichiro violated the will, by removing the annotated Scrolls & Statue. Nichiren Shu also officially agrees. This refutes the Kempon Hokke-Jumonryu's implied position that Nikko & Nichiro received these items in the Will, and that Nikko was jealous about this.

Image hosted by Photobucket.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
My kudos & gratitude to Eddy Chai.
Also many thanks to Kazuo.

See Also:
Mettawaves from Robin's Nest August 30, 2005
The Distribution of the Mementoes/Responses to Hirahara

Posted by rbeck at November 13, 2005 09:07 AM
Comments

To be clear, I am not saying that Nissho was a figure head. I am saying that it appears that
Nichiren did not want to create a position of power and authority in his school.

Posted by: robin at November 15, 2005 03:43 PM

This is a very important post. It should remind us American's to be wary of accepting all the claims of **any** of the sects out there. If the Gakkai were sincere about "dialogue" and "shakubuku" it would have been discussing these documents internally a long time ago -- same goes for NST, Kempon Hokke, and to a lesser extent Nichiren Shu. It is pretty obvious that the "Go-yui-gon" is probably genuine.

Thanks for finding a complete translation of it Robin.

Posted by: Chris at November 13, 2005 10:41 PM

Thu Nov 10, 2005 10:23 am "Christopher H. Holte" wrote:

Good points Robin. However, there are some angles here that we all
need to consider.

First one should consider "why". Why would there be three sets of
documents, two of which contradict each other and the third
document. One of which is fairly considered genuine, and the other
two are disputed and owned by two rival temples. What does that say
about those documents? What do those documents say about their
originators?

First, we can fairly say that both the "distribution of momentos"
and the two transfer documents are apocrypha. Each of them was
written by rival schools. The two transfer documents were even
written by schools that rivaled each other. The leaders of those
schools both deemed the subject important enough to author them.
========================================================
Me on 11-11-2005:
That is correct, I think. I am nit sure that "The two transfer documents were even written by schools that rivaled each other."

Probably Nishiyama wrote the the "Minobu Ttansfer", since it can be read to declare that their temple is "THE Kaidan." However, it also names Nikko as the "Pope" or "Zasu{?}" of the "[Nichiren] Hokke Shu". That serves Taisekiji's interests in more ways than one.
====================================================================TThu Nov 10, 2005 10:23 am "Christopher H. Holte" wrote:
Probably this document is canonical:
"The standing statue of Shakyamuni Buddha must be set up by
the side of the grave. eThe Annotation of the Lotus Sutra, f my
personal collection of the sutra with the most essential quotations,
must be kept in the mausoleum, and the six disciples must check this
in their turn. Other sacred teachings are not necessarily kept this
way. In accord with his last will, I record the above. The 16th day
of the 10th month of 5th year of Kofan {October 16 1282}"
=====================================================================
Me on 11-11-2005:
No probably about it. That is a translation of the "Go-yui-gon" {"Nichiren's Last Will & Testament"}; which is part of the Shuso Gosenge Kiroku
=====================================================================
Robin wrote; Sat Nov 5, 2005 4:46 pm
> > This supports Nikko's claim, and the Taisekiji position,
> > that Nissho & [Nichiro] violated the will, by removing the
> > annotated Scrolls & Statue.
=====================================================================
Me on 11-11-2005:
This does refute the "Go-ibutsu-haibun-cho" {"Distribution of the Mementos"}. It appears that Ikegami Honmonji, a Nichiro lineage Temple, may have forged this {"Distribution of the Mementos", to defend Nissho & Nichiro against charges they looted Nichiren's grave. It states:

The Lotus Sutra, (with notes in Nichiren's own hand), one set to
Ben-ajari (Nissho) (This annotated Lotus Sutra is called the "Chu
Hokekyo")."

"Object of Worship, one figure, a statue of Shakyamuni, to Daikoku-
ajari (Nichiro) One horse and one cloak to Sado-ko (Niko)"
=====================================================================
Me on 11-11-2005:

I have not gotten to this yet. But the "Go-yui-gon" also refutes the Ikagami Transfer which allegedly appoints Nikko as the Abbot of Minobu-san Kuon-ji.

The other one, the Minobu Transfer names Nikko as the "Pope" or "Zasu{?}" of the "[Nichiren] Hokke Shu". This is refuted by the
"Rokuroso", or, in English, "The Six Senior Disciples." On October 8, 1282, Nichiren appointed six disciples to serve as his primary successors, or "Bishops."

They were ranked according to tradition, by seniority; the order of when they became followers of Nichiren. In other words, Nissho was named the overall successor, the "Arch-Bishop," not a "Pope. Moreover, subsequent events, as recorded in the Kiroku, indicate that Nissho assumed that role.

Posted by: robin at November 11, 2005 11:02 AM