January 10, 2010
Ending human terror
Bruce Hoffman in his editorial today maintains that, and I think most people agree that:
- 1. First, "al-Qaeda is increasingly focused on overwhelming, distracting and exhausting us."
- 2. Second, "al-Qaeda [is using]....a strategy of economic warfare."
- 3. Third, "al-Qaeda is ....[seeking] to create divisions within the global alliance ... by targeting key coalition partners."
- 4. Fourth, "al-Qaeda is aggressively seeking out, destabilizing and exploiting failed states and other areas of lawlessness."
- 5. Fifth, ...."al-Qaeda is covetously seeking recruits from non-Muslim countries"
- Source:http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/08/AR2010010803555.html
The only problem with Bruce's analysis is that he presents all the above as something new, which it isn't. But I'm not interested in arguing with neo-cons. I'm interested in some kind of analysis which might lead to solving problems and improving the general human condition, long and short term. The question is, what do these five things tell us? The above list makes a good jumping off point. Lets see if we can solve his problems.
Overwhelming, distracting and exhausting us.
To fight off people out to destroy one, one needs perseverance and courage. To resist Al Qaeda we need to be focused on clear-cut goal. That will let us not be distracted by either acts of terror, or by inattention. Defending the United States at all points is a hopeless cause. There is no possible way to eliminate all risk. But one fights hatred best with mindfulness. If religious extremists want to overwhelm and distract, let them try. Meanwhile we individually and collectively should go about the daily business of having compassion for human beings, even their captured warriors, and cultivating the attributes that it takes for us to live as fully realized human beings anyway; kindness, compassion, dedication to cultivating, practicing, and perfecting the skills each of us needs to fully perform and contribute to our own individual good and the common good. We do that and we amaze, ovewhelm and befuddle those seeking to overwhelm, distract and exhaust us. Focusing on one's "bliss," or best path, is a sure way to do that.
....a strategy of economic warfare.
Economic warfare is possible because people exchange things, and people let others lie and cheat to steal things. The best way to stop groups with perverse goals is to chop them at their knees by conducting honest business and being mindful when others are trying to cheat or steal. By luring us into the war in Afghanistan we are spending a million dollars a soldier, and fighting each other instead of the enemy to spend that money. To beat this enemy, we should recognize that they are only an enemy because a; we are in commerce with the people they live among; and b; we need Saudi oil. The best way to fight their economic warfare would be to build up our own economy, take care of our own citizens, and also build up our own economic independence. But of course we aren't doing that, we are busy creating a complex and ill defined mission in Afghanistan that violates OCCAMS razor (is way too complex), has a long supply line, and involves doubtful goals and outside dependencies. To win the economic warfare being waged by Al Qaeda, we need to consider that getting bogged down in Afghanistan is just what they planned for us; "Rope a Dope" as Mohammed Ali used to say -- with us as the dopes. To win in Afghanistan we probably need to lower our expectations and try to build just enough of a stable Afghanistan so we can leave without our last man having a crease in his helmet.
....[seeking] to create divisions within the global alliance ...
Al Qaeda dreams of the Calliphate. It's a nice dream if one idealizes what the Caliphate was and forgets that the Calliphs were mostly iron fisted despots, and often corrupt to boot. There was a reason that Baghdad fell to the Mongols. It was called corruption. There is a reason that every attempt at imperialism or empire building before or since that time has failed. Each attempt involves building a gold head at the top (where all the gold goes), silver shoulders, and subsequent layers of bronze, Iron and clay; none of which can stand very long because the builders always neglect that their efforts remain efforts with feet of clay. We are all fallible, and none of us is fit to rule the others, so we might as well face it that the USA is best off without following that miserable route -- though we've already walked a ways down it.
The USA is at its best when it remains a mostly capitalist, trading nation, with the willingness to invest in people and places. To beat Taliban at their game, the USA should concentrate on peace building and commerce building. That doesn't require us to keep troops there. But it does involve finding ways to bring the Afghans into the World Economy. Right now we can't even find an alternative crop for the Afghans because our Southern Growers don't want them growing Cotton. Burning Poppy fields is counter-productive. What can we do? Well we can't do it. But we can partner with others to develop the place, build roads, hospitals and police stations, train their police, and then withdraw our troops. Then maybe, just maybe we can pull it off. Right now I give us a 50/50 chance of doing it and a good chance that Americans will do even stupider if we don't find a way of increasing the odds.
When it comes to building alliances we are usually our own worse enemy.
... aggressively seeking out, destabilizing and exploiting failed states and other areas of lawlessness.
We've helped with this. This is where the Al Qaeda are most unforgivable. Islamic extremism mostly ruins Islamic states the way Christianity ruined the Roman Empire. You can't burn libraries and librarians without putting a cost on the next generation. The three most effective forms of investments (proven) are education, health care, and infrastructure. Markets have to be built. Roads have to connect them. Stable banks have to process trades. A free market system is useless without a commons for people to meet and trade in. When warlords, landlords, and corporate barons band together to create a mafia it hurts the common folks even more than the rich and wealthy who can usually bribe their way to adecent living or emigrate. Afghanistan is a failed state because it is out of the way, and also because the US, Britain, Russia, and other countries decided to use it as a battleground and have sabotaged efforts by Afghans to improve their lives. It doesn't have to be so. Sure this has been a miserable truth since the Arabs, Mongols, Tamurlane, and Persians swept into its valleys with swords. But at one time Afghanistan was a prosperous place. The Statues of the Buddha there prove that. The best thing the US could do for Afghanistan would be to rebuild the silk road.
...seeking recruits from non-Muslim countries
The best way to deal with that is to work with moslems to make sure that they market a less radical version of Islam, while clearly showing alternatives. People are attracted to Islam because it makes more sense on some subjects than Christianity does. Is easier to practice than Buddhism, and because Judaism is tribal. Improve the alternatives and Islam is less attractive. Improve Islam and it doesn't matter so much. It is a crying shame that Wahabi Islam is being proselytized and bankrolled by the Saudis. They are basically fighting both sides of the war Bin Ladin is waging. To fight this, need better training for Moslems, and better information about Islam for non-Moslems so they can't lie to us. I've spent some time with syncretists, and am impressed with Sufism. Give me heretics! and people who question authoritarians.
Posted by cholte at January 10, 2010 02:59 PM
Bruce Hoffman is not a johnny come lately to terrorism. Even in high school, he was interested in the subject and to my knowledge, pursued terrorist studies as an undergraduate in the early seventies. He is hardly a neo-con. You offer up a rather naive strategy to combat these killers and cut throats who, behind closed doors, the so-called "moderate arabs" support with their bones and marrow. You offer what I would term at best, an auxiliary approach. I agree with Bruce, Al Queda needs to be utterly destroyed. If they are kept on the defensive, there is little they can accomplish offensively. Developing a division or two of arab speaking American soldier loyalists to infiltrate their organizations and kill their leaders, is an essential component to any strategy to defeat Al Queda.
Buddhism has awesomely powerful tools to cultivate concentration, insight, forbearance, and the heart of authentic compassion. These might be difficult; but there is no real substitute.
In the case of terrorism, what must be defeated is enmity; much of which is amply justified. That is one of the points I want to drive home. It is not Buddhist Forbearance {khanti / kshanti}; nor is it Buddhist Kindness-Compassion {metta-karuna} if the person or situation deserves our patience and/or forgiveness. That would just be normal human emotions.
The real things are enduring the unbearable, forgiving the unforgivable, sending waves of unconditional loving kindness to the malevolent, and feeling empathic sorrow for the despicable; and doing so as naturally as a normal parent cares for their own child.
One caveat -- Bodhisattva Jofukyo ducked and took cover when they threw rocks at him. The Buddha just used the power of his mind to freeze a boulder in mid-air; but that is a skill I have yet to master.
From Rev Ryuie's site in the Nichirenscoffeehouse
"Nichiren then proceeds to cite several sutra passages supporting his view that it is the responsibility of the secular rulers to withdraw support from false teachers, and instead to support and even use deadly force to protect the teachers of the True Dharma.
The Nirvana Sutra: the Buddha teaches his disciple Chunda that the giving of alms a praiseworthy act, therefore alms should be given to all with the exception of the incorrigible evildoer known as an icchantika. The icchantika is defined by the Buddha as a monastic who has killed, stolen, engaged in sexual relations, or lied about spiritual attainments (the four offenses of defeat for monastics that require expulsion of the offender from the monastic Sangha) or who has killed their mother, or their father, or an arhat, or injured the Buddha, or created a schism in the Sangha (the five grave offenses which lead directly to the Avichi Hell and is not only unrepentant but who goes on to slander and despise the True Dharma. More generally, any who slander the True Dharma, even those who are not monks or nuns, can be considered icchantika.
In a passage from chapter 19 of the Nirvana Sutra the story of King Sen’yo is told. According to the story in a past life the bodhisattva who would become Shakyamuni Buddha was a king who put to death several brahmins who slandered the Mahayana sutras. Because he took such action to protect the Mahayana he never thereafter fell into hell in all his subsequent rebirths. In chapter 20, the sutra goes on to explain that those who kill animals, even an ant, will be reborn in the hells or as hungry ghosts or animals; those who kill unenlightened people will also be reborn into those realms but will suffer even more; and those who kill their parents, arhats, pratyekabuddhas or bodhisattvas will fall into the Avichi Hell; but the killing of an icchantika does not bring about any such karmic recompense. The brahmins, in slandering the Mahayana teaching, had become icchantika and therefore King Sen’yo did not commit an evil act in killing them but a good one in fighting to protect the Mahayana."
Mark,
That was a Theocracy; based on a Confucian Ethic. Do you want a theocracy? Now, it is the people who are sovereign. It is our task to support the teachers of our own choice. It is no longer the time for rulers to pick our teachers for us.
There is large menu of teachers and practices from which we can choose. There is no one size fits all practice. We all have different needs. I have confidence that Daimoku elicits my innate discernment, so that I can select the menu items that meet my needs. I have confidence that you, Chris, CL, Q, Andy and the others can do the same thing. I am happy to share what I learn; but have no desire to persuade them I am right. I am not even that certain I am right. All I can do is the best I am able with what I have to work with.
That list of five, the first four seem pretty text book of what the U.S. does as well. Number five would have to be modified slightly to the U.S. is seeking recruits for covert operations in other countries.
If you want to seek solutions don't pretend the problem is someone else. Are americans any less brainwashed by their nationalistic ideology than than the militant Islamic fundamentalists are by theirs?
And does the most brainwashed win?
"I know that the hypnotized never lie!"
"Bruce Hoffman is not a johnny come lately to terrorism. Even in high school, he was interested in the subject and to my knowledge, pursued terrorist studies as an undergraduate in the early seventies."
That is pretty obvious. My quibble with him is that he offers up that list of five things as if it represents a "new" strategy on their part. It really bugs me when someone tries to tell me something is new when its the same game that Bin Laden started playing back in the 1990's.
"He is hardly a neo-con."
He fits my definition of a neo-con perfectly.
"You offer up a rather naive strategy to combat these killers and cut throats who, behind closed doors, the so-called "moderate arabs" support with their bones and marrow."
That was one of my points. There is nothing naive about what I'm talking about. For a guy who claims to be a Buddhist, you don't seem to get the point about the strategy of mindfulness. Mindfulness is about being so aware of reality that one is able to realistically assess both threats and potentials and take the best overall course of action; regardless of short term consequences.
If a person is pursuing one's bliss than that person can combat bad concept with better concept by offering practical and common sense alternatives to the stupidity, perversion and delusion that is present in all bad concept. To get trapped into argument when the opponent has no argument; to get angry when the opponent is merely an ignoramus, all those things are counterproductive.
Zen warriors could kill with impunity largely because they were mindful without also having discipline and compassion. To me the goal of a balanced life is to develop disciplines of compassion, discipline and mindfulness. If any one of these pillars is out of whack the whole sangha gets sick.
Rogow: "You offer what I would term at best, an auxiliary approach."
No I'm talking about using the strategy of the lotus sutra. The auxiliary approach is to continue to combat the causes of failed states, terrorism and warlord behavior. That requires education, science; enlightenment; coupled with universal ethics, awareness and a kind of discipline that is attractive rather than punitive. That requires the things that Buddhism talks about: Mindfulness, compassion and discipline on the part of teachers, and the influence that this has on students and the people these students and teaachers come into contact with.
Concrete groups like "Doctors without Borders" have more power and influence than an entire Army of demons.
"I agree with Bruce, Al Queda needs to be utterly destroyed."
Can one destroy hate? Destroy fear? Destroy terror? One can only destroy the will to hate, the conditions that bring out fear, and the causes that cause organizations like Al Qaeda to arise in the first place. Efforts to destroy Al Qaeda with purely military means are destined to fail. This is because as long as there are people "who, behind closed doors,"...."support with their bones and marrow" the cause of Al Qaeda we'll get nowhere with limited military means and half-hearted measures. An alternative path has to be present, the path of war has to be not destroyed, but degraded and devalued as an alternative. It is precisely because you are right that unilateral, hegemonic, and neo-Imperial policies will never do in Al Qaeda but only make it stronger.
Mark: "If they are kept on the defensive, there is little they can accomplish offensively."
But if as you say ordinary Arabs are supporting them, then taking the offensive is like fighting the dragon's teeth in the Greek Myth. The more you kill the more of them will sprout up.
Mark: "Developing a division or two of arab speaking American soldier loyalists to infiltrate their organizations and kill their leaders, is an essential component to any strategy to defeat Al Queda."
Not going to happen, which is another reason why we need alternatives like energy independence, aid to non-Arabs -- the Afghans aren't Arabs!
What worries me about the Afghan campaign is the sheer disparity in cost. $1,000,000 per soldier, supply lines that are incredibly long, Something like a hundred dollars a gallon for Gasoline, doubtful allies, unreliable government, and a military that can't tell friend from foe. All these are a recipe for disaster.
WE CAN'T afford to be an Empire.
Mark: ""Nichiren then proceeds to cite several sutra passages supporting his view that it is the responsibility of the secular rulers to withdraw support from false teachers, and instead to support and even use deadly force to protect the teachers of the True Dharma."
True enough, but the operative word here is "false" versus true. Read the stories again. Until Buddhism arrived Confucian scholars could do miraculous things with the scrolls of Confucious. Once Buddhism arrived, the legend has it that those miracles no longer worked.
To me the point of the story is more universal than whether or not Buddhism is superior to Confucianism. Eventually Confucians borrowed so much Buddhism, and Buddhists borrowed so much Confucianism in China that it became hard to tell them apart.
To take that story too literally is to miss an important point. The point is that when self interested people borrowed Buddhism, they didn't do it out of truthfulness, compassion, discipline or mindfulness, but in order to keep their power and positions. Thus they borrowed only what was popular or convenient, and discarded that which required effort; compassion, discipline truthfulness/mindfulness.
When scholars, monks and ordinary people do this they become Buddhists in name, but not real Buddhists. When non-Buddhists borrow genuine Buddhist ideas, they become "Buddhists" in their heart even if in name they remain something else. I believe this is what Nichiren was talking about more than the superiority of the Lotus, which to me is demonstrable.
What makes modern Islam, and many other religious groups such a mess is the combination of delusion, illusion and ignorance among both the teachers and followers. When one adds in the attribute of deviousness and disregard for the truth, one gets a completely unwholesome brew. Dishonesty is the root of all corruption. One can teach an innocently ignorant person, but one cannot teach a deviously ignoring person. A person who doesn't even consider the truth is a truly devious and sick person.
If this sort of deviancy and sickness were only an attribute of Bin Laden and his fellow neo-Sunni "Wahabi" followers it would be one thing, but this same sickness is replicated among con artists across the world and across religions; even among Buddhists.